A survey by Griffith University found one in two women have directly experienced sexual harassment from a senior co-worker at an Australian tertiary institution, while 90 per cent of academics have been subject to sexism.

A total of 420 female and non-binary Australian academics contributed to the survey.

The university’s Institute for Educational Research director Leonie Rowan said the figures on everyday forms of sexism were also stark, after 86 per cent of respondents reported they experienced disrespect daily.

“Fifty-six per cent of respondents report being reprimanded and spoken rudely to by a male colleague, 92 per cent feel ignored … and 81 per cent endure the humiliation of being ‘put in their place’,” she said.

"Seventy-four per cent report negative impact on careers [and] 67 per cent say it has impacted a promotion or has had negative financial consequences.

“There were such high numbers of people who were just having these as everyday experiences … which are all precursors to worse behaviours.”

One respondent said the discrimination they faced was impossible to ignore, describing it as “death by a thousand cuts”.

“’They don’t want to sleep with you and you are not going to cook for them. So they ignore you,” another respondent added.

Professor Rowan said sexism can damage women’s careers by impacting the opportunities they’re given and how safe they feel in the workplace.

“It could shape whether or not [a staff member] wants to stay in academic environments,” she said.

Meanwhile, Professor Rowan said the health impacts were also concerning with 71 per cent reporting sexism affected their self-esteem, while 68 per cent have experienced poor mental health.

The survey comes after the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) found incidents of sexual harassment at Australian Universities have increased in the past five years by almost 53 per cent, with one in three staff reporting they’ve experienced an incident.

NTEU president Alison Barnes said it was “hard to fathom” how widespread sexual harassment and sexism was across Australian universities.

“University bosses have failed to address this despite a mountain of evidence showing staff are being sexually harassed and discriminated against at appalling levels,” she said.

“The brutal combination of broken complaints processes and two-thirds of staff being in insecure jobs is fuelling harassment and sexism in universities."

The Action Plan addressing gender based violence in higher education was finalised last week, outlining what needs to be done to solve rife sexual misconduct in universities.

Professor Rowan hopes the results of the survey would further encourage universities to improve the workplace to make it more inviting and safe for female and non-binary staff.

“We really hope [these statistics] will make people feel comfortable to open up conversations and share stories of experiences they had,” she said.

“We want women to feel heard, want non-binary academics to feel heard, and want their voices to not be the end of the conversation.”

This is an example of the kind of behaviours that the College has promised to stamp out, following its receipt of a report about its culture on Friday.

The 'cultural review', commissioned by the College in November 2017 after it failed to be one of the original commissioning USYD Colleges, followed a finding in the Australian Human Rights Commission’s report on sexual harassment and assault on campus: ‘residential settings’ was one of four “recurring themes in incidents of sexual assault and sexual harassment that occurred in university settings”.

Review author, former Sex Discrimination Commissioner Elizabeth Broderick, noted that "the vast majority of students feel respected by their peers and have a strong sense of safety at their College.

"Some students however experience behaviours that make them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. For some, particularly female students, experiences such as sexual harassment by other students and for a few, sexual assault, create significant distress and trauma."

Paul’s boys talk about women behind their backs – everything from female objectification (‘slut’) to making fun of their physical physique (‘whale’). [Female Residential College student]

It’s their Sals [The Salisbury - St Paul's' on-site bar]. It’s their turf. Girls that made friends with freshers know people, but others don’t, and you go [and] dance and get felt up. [Female Residential College student]

To this end, Broderick found that although egregious practices like the 'bone room' purportedly no longer occur, the College could and should do better.

Some St Paul's students added nuance to the discussion:

Talk about being ‘playboys’, I am friends with many [College] girls and have had close talks with them, and they keep talking about how they play with the guys’ feelings, trick them into sporadic sex just to fill their needs and desire to be in a position of power. The landscape has shifted, and it’s genuinely the sub-par all-girls environment that is doing more of this ‘hit and run’ damage... [St Paul's College student]

We, the boys, always get blamed for sexual harassment or assault. When the girls wake up regretting what they did, it’s always our fault. This has got to stop. [St Paul's College student]

In addition to sexual crimes and misdemeanours the report also addressed allegations of elitism, alcohol abuse and hazing.

On behalf of the College, Warden Dr Don Markwell, whose tensure commenced this year, apologised for prior transgressions. St Paul's, which will admit women from next year, has committed to implementing all of the report's recommendations.

USYD Vice-Chancellor and Principal Dr Michael Spence said the College's plan "represents meaningful and substantial leadership".

Despite its troubling findings, the report provided that "...the experience of College of the majority of St Paul’s College students is overwhelmingly positive and rewarding."